مدلی علّی جهت تحلیل عوامل مرتبط با مشارکت در زنجیره ‌تأمین محصولات کشاورزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران،

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

چکیده

مشارکت در زنجیره تأمین به ‌ویژه زنجیره تأمین مواد غذایی و محصولات کشاورزی به دلیل تأثیر آن بر کاهش هزینه‌ها، افزایش سود و اجرای استانداردهای تضمین کیفیت از اهمیت بسیاری برخوردار است. عوامل متعددی در ارتباط با مشارکت در زنجیره ‌تأمین وجود دارد. هدف این مقاله در ابتدا، شناسایی و بررسی عوامل مرتبط با مشارکت در زنجیره ‌تأمین مواد غذایی کشاورزی و در نهایت ارائه مدلی علّی از این عوامل است. پس از مطالعه ادبیات، شش عامل اصلی اشتراک‌گذاری اطلاعات و دانش- فعالیت‌های مشارکتی- روابط میان اعضا- عملکرد مالی- عملکرد غیرمالی- اختلالات زنجیره‌ تأمین شناسایی شدند که دربرگیرنده شاخص مرتبط با مشارکت در زنجیره تامین مواد غذایی کشاورزی هستند. با دریافت نظر خبرگان و اجرای روش دیمتل فازی روابط میان عوامل اصلی تعیین و مدلی علّی ترسیم شد. نمونه آماری این پژوهش شامل 15 نفر از کارشناسان و خبرگان حوزه کشاورزی و تولید مواد غذایی است که با روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله برفی انتخاب شده‌اند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که تأثیرگذارترین عامل، روابط میان اعضای زنجیره ‌تأمین است که بر روی پنج عامل دیگر اثر دارد و عملکرد مالی به‌شدت تحت‌تأثیر سایر عوامل است. همچنین جریان روان اطلاعات همراه با تلاش‌های مشترک اعضا، نقش مؤثری در جهت بالا بردن کیفیت روابط میان اعضا داشته و اعتمادسازی و اجرای تعهدات را تقویت می‌کند که در نهایت منجر به اشتراک‌گذاری مجدد اطلاعات دقیق‌تر خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A causal model to analyze factors related to collaboration in the supply chain of agri-food products

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Shafiei Nikabadi 1
  • Maryam Eshghali 2
1 Industrial Management Department Faculty of Economics and Management Semnan University Semnan Iran
2 Industrial Management Department,, Faculty of Economics, Management, Semnan University Semnan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Collaboration in the supply chain, especially the agri-food supply chain, is very important because of its impact on reducing costs, increasing profits, and implementing quality assurance standards. There are several factors related to collaboration in the supply chain. The purpose of this article is to identify and investigate the factors related to collaboration in the agri-food supply chain and finally to present a causal model of these factors. After studying the literature, 6 main factors were identified including, “collaborative activities”, “sharing of information and knowledge” , “ members relationships” , “financial performance” , “non-financial performance” , “supply chain disruptions” which include 43 indicators related to collaboration in the agri-food supply chain. By receiving experts' opinions and implementing the Fuzzy DEMATEL method, the relationships between the main factors were determined and a causal model was drawn. The statistical sample of this research includes 15 experts in the field of agriculture and food production, who were selected by snowball sampling. The findings showed that the most influential factor is the members relationships of the supply chain, which has an effect on five other factors, and the financial performance is strongly influenced by 5 other factors. Also, the smooth flow of information along with the joint efforts of the members has an effective role in raising the quality of members relationships and strengthens trust and the implementation of commitments, which will ultimately lead to the re-sharing of more accurate information.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Food Supply Chain
  • Agri-Food Supply Chain
  • Fuzzy DEMATEL
  • Collaboration
الفت، ل.، و صدیقی ­گاریز، س. 1393. رتبه­بندی عوامل مؤثر بر تسهیم اطلاعات در زنجیره­ تأمین با به‌کارگیری تکنیک تصمیم­گیری چندمعیاره فازی در صنعت پالایش و پخش فرآورده­های نفتی کشور. مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی، 12 (32): 121-99.
سیفی شجاعی، ح. 1395. ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر بهبود عملکرد مدیریت زنجیره­ تأمین با استفاده از فرایند تحلیل سلسله­مراتبی در صنایع غذایی. مدیریت زنجیره ارزش، 1 (2): 16- 1.
مظفری، م.، و اجلی، م. 1397. مروری بر عوامل کلیدی همکاری در زنجیره­ تأمین. پنجمین همایش ملی پژوهش­های مدیریت و علوم انسانی در ایران، 14 تیر: دانشگاه تهران.
منصوری، س.، و نظری، ک. 1396. مطالعه نقش مدیریت اطلاعات و به­ اشتراک­گذاری آن در زنجیره تأمین. مطالعات مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 5 (20): 120-103.
نعیمی صدیق، ع.، چهارسوقی، ک.، و نخعی کمال‌آبادی، ع. 1394. ارائه مدل زنجیره­ تأمین رقابتی چندمحصولی با رویکرد نظریه بازی. نشریه بین­المللی مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت تولید، 26 (1): 55-44. 
Aggarwal, S., and Srivastava, M. K. 2016. Towards a grounded view of collaboration in Indian agri-food supply chains: A qualitative investigation. British Food Journal, 118 (5): 1085-1106.
Anggraeni, E.W., Handayati, Y., and Novani, S. 2022. Improving Local Food Systems through the Coordination of Agriculture Supply Chain Actors. Sustainability, 14 (6): 3281.
Arias Bustos, C., and Moors, E. H. M. 2018. Reducing post-harvest food losses through innovative collaboration: Insights from the Colombian and Mexican avocado supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199: 1020-1034.
Baah, C.Opoku Agyeman, D.Acquah, I.S.K.Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.Afum, E.Issau, K.Ofori, D. and Faibil, D. 2021. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29 (2): 434-455.
Badraoui, I., Van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., and Boulaksil, Y. 2020. Horizontal logistics collaboration: an exploratory study in Morocco’s agri-food supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23 (1): 85-102.
Ballou, R. H. 2007. The evolution and future of logistics and supply chain management. European business review, 19 (4): 332-348.
Barbosa, M.W. 2021. Uncovering research streams on agri-food supply chain management: A bibliometric study. Global Food Security, 28: 100517.
Chen, J.V., Yen, D.C., Rajkumar, T.M., and Tomochko, N.A. 2011. The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 33 (3): 262-270.
Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., and Amer, Y. 2018. Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186: 851-864.
Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., and Amer, Y. 2020. The assessment of collaboration quality: a case of sugar supply chain in Indonesia. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71 (2): 504-539.
Dos Santos, R.R., and Guarnieri, P. 2020. Social gains for artisanal agroindustrial producers induced by cooperation and collaboration in agri-food supply chain. Social Responsibility Journal, 17 (8): 1131-1149.
Feng, Y. 2012. System dynamics modeling for supply chain information sharing. Physics Procedia, 25: 1463-1469.
Fu, S., Han, Z., and Huo, B. 2017. Relational enablers of information sharing: Evidence from Chinese food supply chains. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117 (5): 838-862.
Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., and Narkhede, B. 2017. Modeling causal factors of post-harvesting losses in vegetable and fruit supply chain: An Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80: 1355-1371.
Handayati, Y., Simatupang, T. M., and Perdana, T. 2015. Agri-food supply chain coordination: the state-of-the-art and recent developments. Logistics Research, 8 (1): 1-15.
Hudnurkar, M., Jakhar, S., and Rathod, U. 2014. Factors Affecting Collaboration in Supply Chain: A Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133: 189-202.
Ivanov, D. 2018. Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management (1st ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
Jeng, D.J.F. 2015. Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 87: 283-295.
Kumar, A., Singh, R. K., and Modgil, S. 2020. Exploring the relationship between ICT, SCM practices and organizational performance in agri-food supply chain. Benchmarking, 27 (3): 1003-1041.
Kwon, I.W.G., and Suh, T. 2004. Factors affecting the level of trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40 (1): 4-14.
Li, Gang. 2020. The impact of supply chain relationship quality on knowledge sharing and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese wmanufacturing industry. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 36 (5): 834-848.
Li, Gang, Fan, H., Lee, P. K. C., and Cheng, T.C. E. 2015. Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164: 83-94.
Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C.D., and Zacharia, Z.G. 2001. Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22 (2): 1-25.
Moubed, M., Boroumandzad, Y., and Nadizadeh, A. 2021. A dynamic model for deteriorating products in a closed-loop supply chain. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 108: 102269.
Msaddak, M., Ben Nasr, J., and Zaibet, L. 2021. Dynamics of trust and cooperation in the dairy value chain: a game simulation approach. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 33 (4): 353-373.
Nyamah, E.Y., Jiang, Y., Feng, Y., and Enchill, E. 2017. Agri-food supply chain performance: an empirical impact of risk. Management Decision, 55 (5): 872-891.
Odongo, W., Dora, M., Molnár, A., Ongeng, D., and Gellynck, X. 2016. Performance perceptions among food supply chain members: A triadic assessment of the influence of supply chain relationship quality on supply chain performance. British Food Journal, 118(7): 1783-1799.
Paluri, R. A., and Mishal, A. 2020. Trust and commitment in supply chain management: a systematic review of literature. Benchmarking, 27 (10): 2831-2862.
Panahifar, F., Byrne, P. J., Salam, M. A., and Heavey, C. 2018. Supply chain collaboration and firm’s performance: The critical role of information sharing and trust. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31 (3): 358-379.
Parast, M.M., and Shekarian, M. 2019. The impact of supply chain disruptions on organizational performance: a literature review. Revisiting Supply Chain Risk, 7: 367-389.
Pomponi, F., Fratocchi, L., and Tafuri, S. R. 2015. Trust development and horizontal collaboration in logistics: A theory based evolutionary framework. Supply Chain Management, 20 (1): 83-97.
Pothal, L.K., Tripathy, S., and Dash, A. 2020. A causal relationship among the key factors of supplier relationship management: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. International Journal of Procurement Management, 13 (3): 383-396.
Ralston, P. M., Richey, R. G., and Grawe, S. J. 2017. The past and future of supply chain collaboration: A literature synthesis and call for research. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28 (2): 508-530.
Ramirez, M.J., Roman, I.E., Ramos, E., and Patrucco, A.S. 2021. The value of supply chain integration in the Latin American agri-food industry: trust, commitment and performance outcomes. International Journal of Logistics Management, 32 (1): 281-301.
Raweewan, M., and Ferrell, W. G. 2018. Information sharing in supply chain collaboration. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 126: 269-281.
Salam, M. A. 2017. The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance: An empirical investigation. Benchmarking, 24 (2): 298-317.
Sarkar, B., Omair, M., and Kim, N. 2020. A cooperative advertising collaboration policy in supply chain management under uncertain conditions. Applied Soft Computing, 88: 105948.
Shafiei Nikabadi, M., and Hakaki, A. 2019. A Multi-Dimensional Causal Model of Effective Factors on Open Innovation in Manufacturing SMEs in Iran. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 10 (2): 91-110.
Shin, Y., Thai, V., and Yuen, K.F. 2018. The impact of supply chain relationship quality on performance in the maritime logistics industry in light of firm characteristics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(3): 1077-1097.
Škrinjar, R., Bosilj-Vukšić, V., and Indihar-Štemberger, M. 2008. The impact of business process orientation on financial and non-financial performance. Business Process Management Journal, 14(5): 738-754.
Sreedevi, R., and Saranga, H. 2017. Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 193: 332-342.
Susanty, A., Bakhtiar, A., Jie, F., and Muthi, M. 2017. The empirical model of trust, loyalty, and business performance of the dairy milk supply chain: A comparative study. British Food Journal, 119 (12): 2765-2787.
Um, K.H., and Kim, S.M. 2019. The effects of supply chain collaboration on performance and transaction cost
advantage: The moderation and nonlinear effects of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 217: 97-111.
Utomo, D.S., Onggo, B.S., and Eldridge, S. (2018). Applications of agent-based modelling and simulation in the agri-food supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 269 (3): 794-805.
Vlachos, I. P. 2014. Reverse food logistics during the product life cycle. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 9 (1-2): 48-73.
Wang, C., and Hu, Q. 2020. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 94: 102010.
Wang, M. and Jie, F. 2020. Managing supply chain uncertainty and risk in the pharmaceutical industry. Article in Health Services Management Research, 33 (3): 156-164.
Wu, M., Weng, Y., and Huang, I. 2012. A study of supply chain partnerships based on the commitment - trust theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24 (4): 690-707.
Zaridis, A., Vlachos, I., and Bourlakis, M. 2021. SMEs strategy and scale constraints impact on agri-food supply chain collaboration and firm performance. Production Planning and Control, 32 (14): 1165-1178.
Zhao, X., Wang, P., and Pal, R. 2021. The effects of agro-food supply chain integration on product quality and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese agro-food processing business. International Journal of Production Economics, 231: 107832.