بررسی اثربخشی روش‌های آموزش کارآفرینی در دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان، گرگان، ایران

چکیده

کلید موفقیت در آموزش کارآفرینی، شناسائی اثربخش‌ترین روش برای ارتقاء دانش و مهارت‌های مورد نیاز در بین دانشجویان است. با بررسی اثربخشی روش‌های مختلف آموزش کارآفرینی می‌توان درک عمیق‌تری در خصوص انتخاب روش‌های مؤثر، در بهبود نیازهای آموزشی دانشجویان و همچنین ایجاد تنوع در تکنیک‌های آموزشی ایجاد کرد. بنابراین، هدف از این مطالعه بررسی اثربخشی روش‌های آموزش کارآفرینی برای دانشجویان در دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان و ارائه توصیه‌ها و دستورالعمل‌های بهبود است. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشجویانی بود که درس کارآفرینی را طی سال‌های 1395 تا 1398 گذرانده‌ بودند. با انجام یک مطالعه پیمایشی و گردآوری اطلاعات از 241 نفر از دانشجویان، اثربخشی 19 روش آموزشی که در درس کارآفرینی تجربه شده بود بررسی شد. نتایج نشان داد که روش‌های مطالعه جزوه درسی و انواع بازدیدهای علمی از کسب‌وکارهای مرتبط ‌بخش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی و همچنین صنعتی، مشارکت در رویدادهای برگزارشده توسط مرکز کارآفرینی دانشگاه و سخنرانی کارآفرینان مدعو در کلاس درس بیشتر استفاده شده است. در بین این روش‌ها جزوه درسی کمترین میزان اثربخشی را داشته است اما دانشجویان معتقد بودند که بازدیدهای علمی، سخنران مهمان و فعالیت در عملی در پارک کسب‌وکار اثربخشی قابل توجهی در ارتقاء دانش و مهارت آنها داشته‌ است. نتایج آزمون ویلکاکسون نشان داد شکاف نمره وضعیت موجود و میزان اثربخشی قابل توجه بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education methods in Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

نویسندگان [English]

  • Baherheh Gonabadi 1
  • Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh 2
1 Department Of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Management,, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,, Gorgan, Iran.
2 Department Of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Management,, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
چکیده [English]

The key to success in entrepreneurship education is identifying the most effective way to enhance the required knowledge and skills among students. By examining the effectiveness of different methods of entrepreneurship education, a deeper understanding of the choice of effective methods can be created to improve the educational needs of students and also to create diversity in educational techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education methods for students at Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources and to provide recommendations and guidelines for improvement. The target population included all students who had passed the entrepreneurship course during the years 2016 to 2019. By conducting a survey study and collecting data from 241 students, the effectiveness of 19 teached educational methods in the entrepreneurship course was evaluated. The results showed that the methods of studying the textbook and various types of scientific visits to related businesses in agriculture and natural resources as well as industrial sectors, participation in events organized by the University Entrepreneurship Center and lectures by invited entrepreneurs in the classroom were used more. Among these methods, the textbook was the least effective, but the students believed that scientific visits, guest speakers, and activities in a business park had a significant effect on improving their knowledge and skills. The results of Wilcoxon test showed that the gap between the current status score and the effectiveness rate was significant.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Entrepreneurship teaching
  • Teaching methods
  • Entrepreneurship learning
  • University students

مراجع

  1. احمدزاده، م.، سالارزهی، ح.، و یعقوبی، ن. م. 1392. بررسی و تحلیل اثربخشی آموزش کارآفرینی در رشته های کارآفرینی با استفاده از مدل ماتریس رضایت. پژوهش­های مدیریت عمومی، 6 (22): 132-107.

    1. آراستی، ز.، حیدری، ه.، و مبارکی، م. ح. 1393. ارزیابی اثربخشی روش آموزش کارآفرینی "سخنران میهمان" (مورد مطالعه: دانشجویان دانشکده کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران). توسعه کارآفرینی، 7 (3): 406-389.
    2. شریف­زاده، م. ش. و عبداله­زاده، غ. 1394. آینده‌نگاشت تعالی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان در چشم‌انداز 142۵.طرح پژوهشی، به سفارش حوزه ریاست دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان.
    3. شریف­زاده، م. ش. و عبداله­زاده، غ. 1394. مولفه‌های توسعه‌ی آموزش کارآفرینی در نظام آموزش عالی کشاورزی.پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی، 7 (32): 96-112.
    4. عبدالهی، ح.، و مقصودی، سم. 1396. شناسایی روش­های اثربخش آموزش کارآفرینی. نشریه مطالعات آموزشی نما،5 (2): 11-1.
    5. Alberti, F., Sciascia, S., and Poli, A. 2004. Entrepreneurship education: notes on an ongoing debate. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual IntEnt Conference, University of Napoli Federico II, Italy (Vol. 4, No. 7).‏
    6. Bauman, A., and Lucy, C. 2019. Enhancing entrepreneurial education: Developing competencies for success. The International Journal of Management Education, 100293.‏
    7. Baumol, W. 2002. The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton University Press.
    8. Bechard, J. P., and Toulouse, J. M. 1998. Validation of a didactic model for the analysis of training objectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4): 317-332.‏
    9. Brentnall, C., Rodriguez, I. D., and Culkin, N. 2018. The contribution of realist evaluation to critical analysis of the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education competitions. Industry and Higher Education, 32(6): 405-417.
    10. Byun, C. G., Sung, C. S., Park, J. Y., and Choi, D. S. 2018. A study on the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programs in higher education institutions: A case study of Korean graduate programs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3): 26-40.‏
    11. Chandler, G. N., and Broberg, J. C. 2019. Using a new venture competition to provide external assessment of a university entrepreneurship program. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2(2): 96-122.
    12. Coleman, S., and Robb, A. 2012. Unlocking innovation in women-owned firms: strategies for educating the next generation of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship Education, (1-2): 99-125.
    13. Cooper, S., Bottomley, C., and Gordon, J. 2004. Stepping out of the classroom and up the ladder of learning: An experiential learning approach to entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher education, 18(1): 11-22.‏
    14. Cruz, N. M., Escudero, A. I. R., Barahona, J. H., and Leitao, F. S. 2009. The effect of entrepreneurship education programmes on satisfaction with innovation behaviour and performance. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33: 198–214..‏
    15. Dhaliwal, S. 2017. The millennial millionaire. How young entrepreneurs turn dreams into business. Palgrave.
    16. Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., and Weaver, K. M. 2008. Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15: 239–258.
    17. Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., and Lassas‐Clerc, N. 2006. Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30: 701–720.‏
    18. Finney, S., and Pyke, J. 2008. Content relevance in case-study teaching: The alumni connection and its effect on student motivation. Journal of Education for Business, 83(5): 251–258.
    19. Fox, J., Pittaway, L., and Uzuegbunam, I. 2018. Simulations in entrepreneurship education: Serious games and learning through play. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1): 61-89.
    20. Gottleib, E., and Ross, J. A. 1997. Made not born: HBS courses and entrepreneurial management. Harvard Business School Bulletin, 73(2): 41-45.‏
    21. Graevenitz, G.V., Harhoff, D., Weber, R. 2010. The effect of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 76: 90–112.
    22. Hahn, J. H., and Ko, U. J. 2007. Comparative Study of Entrepreneurship Programs in the Graduate Schools of Korea and the US. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26(2): 105-131.‏‏
    23. Hannon, P. D., Scott, J. M., Sursani, S. R., and Millman, C. 2006. The state of education provision for enterprise and entrepreneurship: A mapping study of England’s HEIs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4: 41-72.‏
    24. Ilonen, S., and Heinonen, J. 2018. Understanding affective learning outcomes in entrepreneurship education. Industry and Higher Education, 32(6): 391-404.
    25. Jones, C., and English, J. 2004. A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training, 46: 416-423.
    26. Jones, P., Pickernell, D., Fisher, R., and Netana, C. 2017. A tale of two universities: Graduates’ perceived value of entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 59(7/8): 689–705.
    27. Junqueira, M. I. C., and Cruz, A. D. 2019. Crowdfunding and museums: A field trip exemplar in the United Kingdom. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2(2): 151-170.
    28. Kirzner, I. M. 1985. The entrepreneurial process. In I. M. Kirzner (Ed.), Discovery and the capitalist process (pp. 68–93). University of Chicago Press.
    29. Kourilsky, M. L. 1995. Entrepreneurship Education: Opportunity in Search of Curriculum. Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership; Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City, MO, USA.
    30. Kuratko, D. F., and Morris, M. H. 2018. Examining the future trajectory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1): 11–23.
    31. Lee, I. H., and Kim, H. S. 2016). A study on the entrepreneurship curriculum development model to systemize entrepreneurship education in entrepreneurial graduate school. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing Entrepreneurship 11: 131-142.‏
    32. Lee, L., and Wong, P. K. 2007. Entrepreneurship Education—A Compendium of Related Issues (pp. 79-105). The Life Cycle of Entrepreneurial Ventures. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, Springer US.‏
    33. Liñán, F. 2004. Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Business, 3(1): 11-35.‏
    34. Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., and Tumurang, H. 2018. Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3): 37-46.‏
    35. Millman, C., Li, Z., Matlay, H., and Wong, W. C. 2010. Entrepreneurship education and students' internet entrepreneurship intentions: Evidence from Chinese HEIs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17: 569–590.‏
    36. Mukesh, H. V., Pillai, K. R., and Mamman, J. 2020. Action-embedded pedagogy in entrepreneurship education: an experimental enquiry. Studies in Higher Education, 45(8): 1679-1693.‏
    37. Murugesan, R., and Jayavelu, R. 2015. Testing the impact of entrepreneurship education on business, engineering and arts and science students using the theory of planned behaviour: A comparative study. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 7: 256–275.
    38. Nabi, G., Linan, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., and Walmsley, A. 2017. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2): 277–299.
    39. Nabi, G., Walmsley, A., Linan, F., Akthar, I., and Neame, C. 2018. Does entrepreneurship education in the first year of higher education develop entrepreneurial intentions? The role of learning and inspiration. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3): 452-467.
    40. Noyes, E. 2018. Teaching entrepreneurial action through prototyping: The prototype-it challenge. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1): 118–134.
    41. O'Connor, A. 2013. A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes. Journal of business venturing, 28(4): 546-563.‏
    42. Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., Pickernell, D., and Thomas, B. (2010). Attitudes towards entrepreneurship education: A comparative analysis. Education and Training, 52(8/9), 568–586.
    43. Pittaway, L., Hannon, P., Gibb, A., and Thompson, J. (2009). Assessment practice in enterprise education. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 15, 71–93.
    44. Politis, D. 2005. The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 399-424.‏
    45. Rauch, A., and Hulsink, W. 2015. Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: An investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behavior. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(2): 187–204.
    46. Sousa, M. J., Carmo, M., Goncalves, A. C., Cruz, R., and Martins, J. M. 2019. Creating knowledge and entrepreneurial capacity for HE students with digital education methodologies: Differences in the perceptions of students and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 94: 227–240.
    47. Ustav, S., and Venesaar, U. 2018. Bridging metacompetencies and entrepreneurship education. Education and Training, 60(7): 674–695.
    48. Vesper, K.H., and Gartner, W.B. 1997. Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5): 403-421.‏
    49. Walter, S. G., and Block, J. H. 2016. Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An institutional perspective. Journal of Business venturing, 31(2): 216-233.‏
    50. Wenninger, H. 2019. Student assessment of venture creation courses in entrepreneurship higher education—An interdisciplinary literature review and practical case analysis. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2(1): 58–81.
    51. Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., and Cloodt, M. 2014. The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3): 623-641.‏

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار